<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Cyberlaw Currents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cyberlawcurrents.com/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cyberlawcurrents.com</link>
	<description>A Frankfurt Kurnit Blog About the Law of Doing Business on the Internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 05:28:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on WIPO: Anti-Glenn Beck Domain Name Was Not Defamatory by Domain Name Disputes &#124; Pearltrees</title>
		<link>http://www.cyberlawcurrents.com/?p=290#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Disputes &#124; Pearltrees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 05:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberlawcurrents.com/?p=290#comment-6</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] CyberLaw Currents » WIPO: Anti-Glenn Beck Domain Name Was Not Defamatory Legal disputes over allegedly defamatory statements on blogs and social media sites are fairly common.  This source is a blog entry about the Anti-Glenn  British Telecommunications Plc, Virgin Enterprises Ltd, J Sainsbury Plc, Marks &amp; Spencer Plc, and Ladbroke Group Plc v One in a Million Ltd and others  Date 23 July 1998 Legislation  This web source is a case summary of the English [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CyberLaw Currents » WIPO: Anti-Glenn Beck Domain Name Was Not Defamatory Legal disputes over allegedly defamatory statements on blogs and social media sites are fairly common.  This source is a blog entry about the Anti-Glenn  British Telecommunications Plc, Virgin Enterprises Ltd, J Sainsbury Plc, Marks &amp; Spencer Plc, and Ladbroke Group Plc v One in a Million Ltd and others  Date 23 July 1998 Legislation  This web source is a case summary of the English [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Use of Competitor’s Names as Advertising Keywords Does Not Violate Rights of Publicity, Says Wisconsin Court of Appeals by Haga information</title>
		<link>http://www.cyberlawcurrents.com/?p=1573#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>Haga information</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 21:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberlawcurrents.com/?p=1573#comment-81</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Haga information...&lt;/strong&gt;

Nice post. I learn something totally new and challenging on websites I stumbleupon everyday. It&#039;s always helpful to read articles from other writers and use a little something from other websites....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Haga information&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nice post. I learn something totally new and challenging on websites I stumbleupon everyday. It&#8217;s always helpful to read articles from other writers and use a little something from other websites&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FTC Seeks Public Comments on Additional Proposed Revisions to Children’s Online Privacy Protection Rule by Homepage</title>
		<link>http://www.cyberlawcurrents.com/?p=1454#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Homepage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberlawcurrents.com/?p=1454#comment-72</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;... [Trackback]...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...] Read More here: cyberlawcurrents.com/?p=1454 [...]...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>&#8230; [Trackback]&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...] Read More here: cyberlawcurrents.com/?p=1454 [...]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on California Issues Privacy Policy Warnings to App Developers by CyberLaw Currents &#187; CA Attorney General Sues Delta Air Lines for Alleged Privacy Policy Failure</title>
		<link>http://www.cyberlawcurrents.com/?p=1494#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>CyberLaw Currents &#187; CA Attorney General Sues Delta Air Lines for Alleged Privacy Policy Failure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberlawcurrents.com/?p=1494#comment-80</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] one month after sending notices of noncompliance with the California Online Privacy Protection Act (“CalOPPA”) to approximately 100 mobile [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] one month after sending notices of noncompliance with the California Online Privacy Protection Act (“CalOPPA”) to approximately 100 mobile [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Privacy Measures Announced by the White House and the California Department of Justice by CyberLaw Currents &#187; California Issues Privacy Policy Warnings to App Developers</title>
		<link>http://www.cyberlawcurrents.com/?p=1451#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>CyberLaw Currents &#187; California Issues Privacy Policy Warnings to App Developers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 15:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberlawcurrents.com/?p=1451#comment-71</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] On October 30, 2012, the California Attorney General’s office issued a press release stating that formal notices of noncompliance with the California Online Privacy Protection Act were being issued to up to 100 mobile app developers and companies. The Attorney General’s letters, a sample version of which is available here notified addressees that they violated California’s privacy law by collecting personally identifiable information from consumers without first posting their privacy policies conspicuously and in a way that is reasonably accessible to consumers. Companies that fail to correct the noncompliance within 30 days after being notified could face fines of up to $2,500 for each download of a noncompliant app. This enforcement action follows a Joint Statement of Principles  wherein seven major app and social platforms (Amazon, Apple, Facebook, Google, Hewlett-Packard, Microsoft, and Research in Motion) committed to taking steps to enhance consumer privacy, as we discussed previously here. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] On October 30, 2012, the California Attorney General’s office issued a press release stating that formal notices of noncompliance with the California Online Privacy Protection Act were being issued to up to 100 mobile app developers and companies. The Attorney General’s letters, a sample version of which is available here notified addressees that they violated California’s privacy law by collecting personally identifiable information from consumers without first posting their privacy policies conspicuously and in a way that is reasonably accessible to consumers. Companies that fail to correct the noncompliance within 30 days after being notified could face fines of up to $2,500 for each download of a noncompliant app. This enforcement action follows a Joint Statement of Principles  wherein seven major app and social platforms (Amazon, Apple, Facebook, Google, Hewlett-Packard, Microsoft, and Research in Motion) committed to taking steps to enhance consumer privacy, as we discussed previously here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Twitter Changes DMCA Takedown Policy by Punxsutawney CyberLaw Currents ? Twitter Changes DMCA Takedown Policy &#124; Punxsutawney</title>
		<link>http://www.cyberlawcurrents.com/?p=1488#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>Punxsutawney CyberLaw Currents ? Twitter Changes DMCA Takedown Policy &#124; Punxsutawney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 01:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberlawcurrents.com/?p=1488#comment-78</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Source: http://www.cyberlawcurrents.com/?p=1488 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source: <a href="http://www.cyberlawcurrents.com/?p=1488" rel="nofollow">http://www.cyberlawcurrents.com/?p=1488</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FTC Recommends Best Practices For Using Facial Recognition Technology by CyberLaw Currents ? FTC Recommends Best Practices For Using &#8230; &#124; Winter Family Vacation Packages</title>
		<link>http://www.cyberlawcurrents.com/?p=1483#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>CyberLaw Currents ? FTC Recommends Best Practices For Using &#8230; &#124; Winter Family Vacation Packages</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 17:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberlawcurrents.com/?p=1483#comment-77</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Source: http://www.cyberlawcurrents.com/?p=1483 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source: <a href="http://www.cyberlawcurrents.com/?p=1483" rel="nofollow">http://www.cyberlawcurrents.com/?p=1483</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FTC Recommends Best Practices For Using Facial Recognition Technology by CyberLaw Currents ? FTC Recommends Best Practices For Using &#8230; &#124; adidasi-haine-online.info</title>
		<link>http://www.cyberlawcurrents.com/?p=1483#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>CyberLaw Currents ? FTC Recommends Best Practices For Using &#8230; &#124; adidasi-haine-online.info</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 07:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberlawcurrents.com/?p=1483#comment-76</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Source: http://www.cyberlawcurrents.com/?p=1483 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source: <a href="http://www.cyberlawcurrents.com/?p=1483" rel="nofollow">http://www.cyberlawcurrents.com/?p=1483</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FTC Recommends Best Practices For Using Facial Recognition Technology by CyberLaw Currents ? FTC Recommends Best Practices For Using &#8230; &#124; Summer Vacation Tabs</title>
		<link>http://www.cyberlawcurrents.com/?p=1483#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>CyberLaw Currents ? FTC Recommends Best Practices For Using &#8230; &#124; Summer Vacation Tabs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 06:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberlawcurrents.com/?p=1483#comment-75</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Source: http://www.cyberlawcurrents.com/?p=1483 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source: <a href="http://www.cyberlawcurrents.com/?p=1483" rel="nofollow">http://www.cyberlawcurrents.com/?p=1483</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FTC Recommends Best Practices For Using Facial Recognition Technology by CyberLaw Currents ? FTC Recommends Best Practices For Using &#8230; &#124; Fake Friends Biography</title>
		<link>http://www.cyberlawcurrents.com/?p=1483#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>CyberLaw Currents ? FTC Recommends Best Practices For Using &#8230; &#124; Fake Friends Biography</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 06:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberlawcurrents.com/?p=1483#comment-74</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Source: http://www.cyberlawcurrents.com/?p=1483 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source: <a href="http://www.cyberlawcurrents.com/?p=1483" rel="nofollow">http://www.cyberlawcurrents.com/?p=1483</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
